Dreamhost Vs Siteground (Find out Which is the Best)


Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On February 11, 2023
Last modified:February 13, 2023

Summary:

There are many web hosting services with remarkable attributes and fantastic options that you can choose to get the best hosting for your company. But for the purpose of this blog post, we'll be focusing on the DreamHost and SiteGround hosting providers who are both award champions in the hosting business.

There are many hosting solutions with outstanding attributes and great options that you can pick to get the best hosting for your enterprise. However, for the purpose of this article, we will be concentrating on the DreamHost and SiteGround hosting companies who are both award champs in the hosting business.

In this battle, DreamHost vs SiteGround, declaring a winner can be likened to unilaterally declaring one musician the best in the world.

Not considering genre and mood needs at a particular time, which is often not an easy choice as both offer comparable features, but your preferences taking into consideration price and plans, money-back guarantee, ease of use, security, credibility, and other factors can point you in the direction of the most suitable platform for your needs.

DreamHost and SiteGround hosting companies are though different but are at par in some of the features they offer. Before we look at things we like and those things we do not like on either platform, let’s first see some features that make it difficult to choose between these hosting providers as they offer the same level of performance in these features.

Dreamhost Vs Sitegound | Basic Features

dreamhost and siteground

Source: aawebmasters.com

1-Click Software Installation

DreamHost and SiteGround provide 1-click software installation on their cPanel. This makes it easy to install special programs and content such as Zencart, WordPress, calendar utilities and photo gallery. Moreover, 1-click installers assist in performing security program, streaming your page and powering your site to live.

Site Backup

Both DreamHost and SiteGround allow for effective backups. DreamHost periodically carries out programmed “snapshots” of your information. Besides, it is easy for you to carry out a manual backup of your databases, sites, and record information via the control panel.

On the other hand, SiteGround uses softaculous 1-click installer to restore and backup your destination files whenever the need arises. All backup files and data are stored data up to 30days.

Having known where these two hosting organizations come up a level, let’s look at things we like and those things we do not like in both hosting companies that will affect our choice of hosting brands.

What Sets DreamHost Apart

DreamHost Web Hosting For Your Purpose

1. Beginners will like DreamHost as its shared hosting plan provides enough space for blog sites, small e-commerce webpage or a new company. Additionally, you get a free domain with this plan.

2. DreamHost exclusive control board is something we will also like. The control board is relatively different from the business standard control panel in that it feels more like a routine dashboard with a left route board. It is easy to reshuffle things or change various areas of the board. Similarly, you can make use of the control panel to install WordPress via the 1-click installer.

3. Another feature that we like DreamHost for is its uptime and reliability. Solid fast page loading and uptime are non-debatable. DreamHost ensures 100% uptime as against 99.9% uptime for SiteGround.

4. When it comes to WordPress hosting comparison, we will like DreamHost for their fully managed WordPress solution, DreamPress.

DreamPress offers enhanced speed, scaling and security by configuring various settings and plugins that streamline WordPress installation, databases, and server operations, DreamHost is one of only four hosting providers recommended by the WordPress core team.

5. As regards VPN hosting, we also like DreamHost, with their scalable RAM and SSD storage, DreamHost’s VPS and a more stable environment ripe for growth slightly higher than what Siteround offers. RAM ranges from 1GB to 8GB, while storage varies between 30GB and 240GB.

What we don’t like about Dreamhost

  • Several of the features attract extra fees
  • Response time on live chat is slow
  • You pay additional cost if you need Premium WordPress Hosting
  • Not particularly good for sophisticated users as there are incompatibilities with the installation of vital software
  • Plans and options are limited

What Sets Siteground Apart

SiteGround Web Hosting Services

SiteGround established in 2004 as opposed to Dreamcast which took flight seven (7) years earlier in 1997, stamped its presence as it selected to concentrate on speed optimization and custom software solutions of its server which is something we like.

Unlike DreamHost whose primary goal was to outfit, the power of open-source to help any individual who needed an internet presence, primarily and economically.

1. SiteGround comes with a web builder which you can easily use in designing your site even if you are not a tech geek.

2. SiteGround utilizes the well-known, simple to-utilize control panel control board. It highlights softaculous for 1-click installations of programming contents, without spam email, Cloudflare CDN, auto updates for Joomla and WordPress, SuperCacher and Staging domain for you when you need to test changes to your site.

3. Siteground takes account security serious; that’s why they prevent one record from influencing the execution of another. They carry out isolation of accounts and counteract any potential security breaks.

Additionally, SiteGround is proactive in screening and recognizing security abuses, and thereby using its own special patches to take care of any form of susceptibility. Some of the mechanisms put in place to enhance security include CloudFlare CDN, SSL Certificates, SSH Access, and constant hardware upgrades.

4. SiteGround offers better prices and plans. Its’ shared hosting startup design does not support eCommerce sites like its rival. You can only have an eCommerce site if you choose to accept the GoGeek design which gives free PCI-consistence and devoted IP address.

5. We also like SiteGround for its’ stand-out ratings in various comparisons as against DreamHost by many websites. SiteGround rating is distinguished in such comparisons as cheap hosting, dedicated hosting, site builder hosting and even in the overall hosting comparison.

What we don’t like about Siteground

  • Not suitable for monthly users as the shortest billing cycle is 12 months
  • Storage is limited when compared with other providers
  • It lacks Google Adwords credits as against what obtains in major hosting companies like Hostgator, Bluehost, etc.
  • Prices are on the high side
  • May not be the best option for people on a lean budget since the cheapest plans allow only 10,000 visitors per month
  • Some critical features are not available for the affordable hosting plans

DreamHost Vs Siteground | Conclusion

DreamHost has more than 1,500,000 sites, blogs and apps, and SiteGround has around 450,000.

However, in this, DreamHost vs SiteGround battle, you will notice that DreamHost is highly suitable for eCommerce and business settings that are in need of a company that offers high quality, flexibility and option to help them tweak their plans.

It may not be the best option for bloggers or anyone that is just starting out and wants to make his business visible on the web. On the other hand, SiteGround is excellent for business people, home use, and for business enterprises with some money to spend.

We like the transparent price structure in DreamHost, its exceptional money-back guarantee, outsourcing of its server farms to experts, and we also like SiteGround for its conservative, control panel control board that is easy to use, security consciousness, and worldwide server organization.

3 thoughts on “Dreamhost Vs Siteground (Find out Which is the Best)”

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.